|

State Goes After Legendary All-Age Music Clubs
by Marisa Lagos, Chronicle Staff Writer
[mlagos@SFChronicle.com]
A teenager's first concert is a rite of passage of sorts, and in San
Francisco, that rite often is undertaken at one of the city's inexpensive,
small, all-ages music clubs - a type of business that owners warn might
not survive much longer because of new enforcement efforts by state
alcohol officials.
Bay Area natives probably can recall their first show at
the Fillmore, one of San Francisco's most famous music halls and the site
of performances that span generations of music - from Jimi Hendrix to The
Roots. These days, music fans might go to Potrero Hill's Bottom of the
Hill club, the Tenderloin's Great American Music Hall or Cafe du Nord in
the Castro.
Those venues could be forced to close, owners say, if
the state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, better known as
ABC, continues to impose rules that club attorneys argue
are legally questionable and often unrelated to booze or safety issues.
Some of the clubs say they only recently learned about the new rules,
which are not written into state law and haven't been enforced in the
past.
For example, ABC has decreed that at
least half of the clubs' revenue must come from food sales. The agency
also is taking issue with minor operating changes, such as one club's
decision to open an hour later.
In almost every case, the San Francisco clubs who have
been battling ABC have the support of neighbors and local
leaders.
ABC officials, meanwhile, won't comment
on most pending cases but insist that they are not overstepping their
authority. A spokesman said the agency is taking appropriate action to
protect the public.
Yet the ABC rules have some in the
industry worried about where local bands will get their first break and
where young people will go to experience live music if the clubs cease to
exist.
"Without these businesses, there's no local music scene - it's that
simple," said Jordan Kurland, co-owner of San Francisco's Noise Pop music
festival. "It's such a special experience when you are young to see a band
you love in an intimate place ... where they are able to charge a more
reasonable ticket price. These small-capacity venues are very generous
about paying bands, and, like any club in the world, they predominantly
make their money off the bar, not off ticket sales."
Not an eating place
All of the clubs fighting the ABC -
Bottom of the Hill, Slim's, Cafe Du Nord and Great American Music Hall -
are licensed to operate as all-ages venues because they serve food.
Historically, however, they have made most of their income from alcohol
and ticket sales.
According to state law, businesses with that type of
license must regularly serve meals - but the code makes no mention of a
minimum sales requirement. Still, some clubs have conditions set on their
license by the ABC, such as a requirement that food sales
exceed alcohol sales.
But that wasn't the case at the Great American Music
Hall, a storied 38-year-old venue where the Grateful Dead recorded "One
From the Vault." There were no conditions on the permit, which was last
issued six years ago when the ownership changed, but the venue is being
been targeted by the ABC anyway.
ABC spokesman John Carr said the
scrutiny has come because the club has "had a substantial change to its
operation from that represented in their license application." He said the
agency determined that the legendary venue is not operating as a "bona
fide public eating place."
"Instead, they have altered the character of their business and are
operating more like a club," he wrote in an e-mail to The Chronicle.
Carr said a change matters because any ABC
license - and public input on it - is based on a club's business plan.
Club owners and their lawyers counter that the "business
plan" the ABC is referring to is a state form filled out
before a license is issued and that the form requires only that the agency
be notified if the physical premises change.
Dawn Holliday, who owns a small stake of Slim's and the Music Hall and
manages both venues, vehemently disagreed with Carr's assertion that the
business has changed.
If anything, she said, the Music Hall might serve more meals now than
it did in years past. But it has always been a music club, Holliday said.
"The Great American Music Hall hasn't changed since 1971 - I know
because I've been going there since then," Holliday said. "I want to sell
food, and not just because we're dictated to do it. I don't think bands
should play without eating ... (but) it's not a majority of our income."
Bottom of the Hill also has come under fire for the minimum food
requirement, though in that case it was a condition of the license.
"Thirty or 35 percent of our sales come from food on our
best days," said Tim Benetti, co-owner of Bottom of the Hill, which has
been around for 18 years. "If ABC gets what they want, we
will go out of business. Can you imagine San Francisco without Slim's,
Bottom of the Hill or Cafe Du Nord? I can't."
Carr said Bottom of the Hill's license has required the
club's alcohol sales to be less than its food sales since 2001, when the
ownership changed slightly and it had to reapply for a liquor license.
Benetti acknowledged that the club agreed to the condition but said the
owners felt pressured. The company immediately afterward hired a lawyer to
challenge the agency's authority to set such a requirement.
Carr said generally the agency imposes conditions in response to
community complaints or adds them after a "disciplinary process."
Authority questioned
John Hinman, the attorney representing Cafe Du Nord,
said his club was chastised by the ABC for opening to the
public at 7 p.m. instead of 5 p.m., the hour owners put on their
application form more than 15 years ago.
The owners explained that they open at 5 to feed the
bands, Hinman said, but the ABC still challenged their
state liquor license. The agency also demanded that the club start selling
at least as much food as alcohol, he said, even though that condition was
never on the license.
The case was dismissed by an ABC judge,
but Hinman said he expects the agency to refile the complaint. He argued
that there is no statutory basis for the rules, which he contends are
being made up by the ABC without any communication to
club owners.
"I don't know if we're supposed to call the Dionne Warwick psychic hot
line or what," added Holliday.
The fight has caught the attention of neighbors, the
music industry and elected officials, including San Francisco Supervisor
Sophie Maxwell and state Sen. Mark Leno, who in February sent a letter to
the attorney general's office asking for a legal opinion on the
ABC's authority. The office this week declined to weigh in, Leno
said, because some of the matters are still in litigation with the
ABC.
Leno said he will meet with ABC
officials on Monday to express his concerns. He noted that tourism is one
of the city's biggest job generators and said he hasn't heard of similar
restrictions in other cities.
"I believe the ABC has a job to do - of
course enforcing the current law and protecting public safety, but also
protecting the well-being of businesses," he said. "In San Francisco,
we're doing very well at working out our differences locally, and when you
have this outside force that has the power to issue and revoke license and
put small businesses out of business, I take it very seriously."
Some San Franciscans, including Maxwell and Bottom of
the Hill neighbor Kepa Askenasy, said they are baffled by the attention
since the clubs in question have always had good reputations locally.
Maxwell said she has received no complaints about Bottom of the Hill and
noted that it is seen as a family venue.
"It's part of our culture," Askenasy said.
|